An Ecological Reading of A Midsummer Night's Dream
The Quarrel of Titania and Oberon by Sir Joseph Noel Paton
Contagious fogs. Crows fat on carrion. Seasonal disruption. Rotting crops. Rheumatic plagues and pandemics. This could easily read as a contemporary early morning doomscroll. The Gulf Stream shows signs of collapse. Record temperature highs. Pollinators facing massive extinction. Massive crop failure predicted due to erratic weather patterns. Above normal hurricane season anticipated. “From our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original,” is a finely turned phrase for what is an increasingly common sentiment among the ecologically sober: massive industrialization and ecocide have destabilized the dynamic homeostasis of the biosphere, provoking unpredictable and emergent climatological events that are this system’s attempt to restore some sort of balance. Put more simply, the current escalating environmental catastrophe is our fault. We are its parents: it stems from our debates, our abstractions and self-importance and unquenchable appetites.
But this doomscroll monologue is not contemporary. It comes to us from the mouth of the Fairy Queen Titania in Shakespeare’s famous comedy A Midsummer’s Night Dream. She is addressing her estranged fairy husband Oberon, whose “bed and company” she has foresworn after a disagreement about “a changeling Indian boy” whose mother used to be one of Titania’s devotees. The boy seems a classic version of Anne Carson’s idea of the “ruse” in a romance: a necessary third term introduced to triangulate erotic distance and tension between the two lovers who would become dull and collapse any potential for narrative if they consummated their love too soon.
But unlike human lovers, this couple’s disagreement is not a private affair. No, it is an ecological event. When the royal fairies feud, the environment feels their disagreement intimately, responding with seasonal asynchrony: The seasons alter: “hoary-headed frosts / Fall in the fresh lap of the crimson rose; /And on old Hiems’ thin and icy crown,
/ An odorous chaplet of sweet summer buds/ Is, as in mockery, set….” Titania tells Oberon that “this same progeny of evils come from our debate”. Beyond the grand ecological ramifications of their romantic conflict, the human world is also disordered with Demetrius and Helen and Lysander and Hermia, the play’s human lovers, incorrectly matched in their romantic orientation. Helena loves Demetrius who loves Hermia. Hermia loves Lysander although her father insists that she entertain Demetrius’s suit.
The romantic rift between the fairy couple is represented holographically throughout the play in “unequal matches” between lovers and between the civilized world of human beings and the wilderness of the forest, between day and night. Puck, Oberon’s “shrewd and knavish sprite”, acts in a traditional trickster role, amplifying the disorder to paradoxically, bring about ultimate rebalancing and resolution.

